“QUENTIN CRISP WAS SELF-HATING AND HOMOPHOBIC” SAYS TATCHELL

Comment, News, Theatre by HOMOVISION on December 28, 2009 at 1:27 pm

In a statement released today, Peter Tatchell says Quentin Crisp was a self-hating homophobe. He also criticises tonight’s ITV’s An Englishman in New York drama of sanitising Crisp’s rejection of gay rights and equality.

Tatchell says: “Quentin Crisp was a contradictory, infuriating figure. Although astonishingly brave and defiant as an out gay man in the 1930s and 40s, he was later defiantly self-obsessed, homophobic and reactionary. Quentin denounced the gay rights movement and slammed homosexuality as ‘a terrible disease’; adding that ‘the world would be better without homosexuals.’

“This is a good film, with another stunning performance by John Hurt, but it sanitises Crisp’s ignorant, pompous homophobia. Quentin disparaged homosexuality as an illness, affliction, burden, curse and abnormality. He regarded himself as ‘disfigured’ by his gayness. He never spoke out for gay rights or supported any gay equality cause,” added Tatchell.

“An Englishman in New York invites us to admire Crisp as a hero and pioneer. By the time he moved to the United States he had ceased to be either heroic or pioneering. He turned into an ever-more bitter, self-obsessed person who resented that they way millions of gay people had come out and stolen his limelight.

“Quentin hated the fact that he was no longer unique – no longer the only visible queer on the block. For this reason, he loathed the gay liberation movement of the 1960s and 1970s. It had encouraged and empowered the mass coming out of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) people. He disliked being over-taken and over-shadowed by others; dismissing the new generations of out and proud gay people as johnny-come-latelys.

“He never backed any campaign against homophobic discrimination or violence, and he declined to condemn anti-gay politicians and preachers.

“Quentin Crisp is no gay icon. The true icons and pioneers of the modern British gay community are heroes like Allan Horsfall and Antony Grey. They were the driving forces of the first gay rights organisations in Britain – the North West Homosexual Law Reform Committee set up in 1964 and the Homosexual Law Reform Society, established earlier in 1958. These two men, who are still alive and have never received the public recognition they deserve, have done far more for gay dignity and advancement than Quentin Crisp.

“Crisp is a pale shadow of US gay rights trailblazers like Harry Hay, Frank Kameny, Del Martin and Phyllis Lyon.

“The film acknowledges that Crisp disgracefully dismissed Aids as a ‘fad’, at a time when thousands of gay men were dying and the US government was largely ignoring the epidemic. Sadly, it ignores his ridiculing of the gay liberation movement and his dismissal of the struggle for lesbian and gay equal rights.

“Echoing the worst homophobes, Crisp said that gay men were incapable of love and incapable of caring about other people. The supposed lack of altruism among gay men was, according to Quentin, because they had ‘feminine minds.’ He was a misogynist, as well as a homophobe.

“In 1997, he told The Times that he would advise parents to abort a foetus if could be shown to be genetically predetermined to be gay: ‘If it (homosexuality) can be avoided, I think it should be.’

“Compared to The Naked Civil Servant, this is a much less satisfying film, partly because it portrays Quentin true to life, as a much less sympathetic warts-and-all character, which is what he became in the latter part of his life,” added Tatchell.

For more information about Peter Tatchell’s campaigns: www.petertatchell.net

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Related Posts with Thumbnails Tags: , , , , , , ,
  • aido
    @Ryan. I wonder if you'd care to clarify some of the points you made.

    Exactly how do people like [Peter Tachell] put the gay movement back?

    Is is not a good thing that he gets media coverage for gay issues?

    Can you point out some of the "many ways" you state that him and Quentin Crisp are not dis-similar?

    And also, I'd be interested in what you think he gets out of his human rights work? It's certainly not for money, or the good for his health.

    Is someone really going to go to all that trouble for the sake of an ego trip? Or is the answer much simpler, that Peter Tatchell is one of those rare individuals who care enough about a cause to dedicate themselves to it, regardless of the personal cost - not that I'm saying he's perfect by any means.
  • ryan
    well well well. peter tatchells ego gos into overdrive once again!
    is there anything this man wont do for attention? while its true that quentin crisp is most of the things he discribed. why did it have to be him to point it out...especially when that person is no longer around to defent themselves! that seems to be mr tatchell all over.
    and while where on the subject, why doesnt peter look at himself these days!
    i am not a supporter of peter tachell and i personally think people like him put the gay movment back not forward. and when ever he seems to make statements or do anything, it always seems to be somthing that will get him into the papers or such!
    quentin wasn't perfect...but neither is peter by a long stretch!
    they are not dissimiler in many ways when u think about it.
    im start to get mighty sick of mr tatchells ego trying to mustle in on on every subject and try and take the lime light for himself. the program wasnt about gay rights, it was a well acted film about a very intereting person. thats all that needed to be said.
  • leftgay
    Quentin crisp didn't do much for the gay movement but then I don't really view him as a person where "being gay" was all he was about.. like warhol he is to be looked at as an individual who was both troubled and a genius. Being gay was merely an extra feature.
  • i interpret hedonistic gay behaviour in a different way... thruout human history the 'queer folk' were often, and on every continent, healers and shamans for the main tribe. for us nowadays this is the missing spiritual component of who we are... we may have gained political rights but spiritually we are still largely in the dark. standing ... See Morebetween the hetero genders we offer different view on life, we conduct energy (have u felt the difference in energy quality in rich pumping queer parties compared to hettie clubs?) and we are driven to reach for bliss. altho dismissed by modern rational thought, bliss has been understood around the planet for ever as the frequency of Great Spirit/God/Goddess. Bliss changes our lives, brings insight, revelation, growth, healing. Did that first e change your life? what has K told u about the secrets of the universe?

    Our sex doesnt create children.. it creates light... but without a spiritual framework in most gay mens lives we can end up just chasing after the fix of the sexual or drug high again and again. i spend time at gatherings of radical faeries and queer spirits and can testify that we are a loving people. when the defences are down and the need to compete removed we naturally care for each other, and are capable of generating love based healing spaces that are badly needed, and will be more so as the world stumbles forwards into the 21st centry. gays could be turning their lust for life into pure alchemical gold. we only 40 years into our story of liberation, we could be reaching for its higher reaches, but that does require opening our minds and emotions as well as our arses........
  • Everything Peter says is true but Quentin never said he was a spokesperson for anyone but himself. And I think you have to take into account the period he grew up in. To be a self-loathing homosexual in the 30's and 40's was quite commonplace. Can we expect gay men to shake off these feelings later on in life? I don't think we can. Have we completely shaken off ours from our upbringing? For me Quentin was a stopped clock. But no less interesting because of that. He was part of our history.

    Re the film, I do think The Naked Civil Servant was unique in that, probably for the first time, a television progarmme was portraying an 'out' gay man in a sympathetic light. And I think that this, inadvertently, helped pave the way (along with countless others) to the more accepting society that we have today.
blog comments powered by Disqus