World AIDS Day: AIDS Incorporated?

News by HOMOVISION on December 1, 2008 at 5:51 pm

We were thinking about writing a feature here about World AIDS Day – what it means and why it’s important. But you could check that out here, here, here and here.

But instead we invited ScallyDanDan – a visual artist from Manchester to offer an alternative view for World AIDS Day.

Is the current AIDS situation working?

As I write this it is World AIDS Day. Like most gay men, we’ve all been touched by the effects of this vicious disease, either individually or through people we know and love. When a disease has such clear destructive effects, emotions are so high and views about it so rigidly carved; it can be dangerous to radically challenge the ‘official line’ about the causes and propagation of it.

Although few of us question the root of the official line, and it’s singular repetition of sticking to ‘the one story’ which suits the needs of the pharmaceutical cartels, the funding agencies and the organisations which rely on that funding, who in turn regurgitate the same story.

Whilst this disease is ravaging the lives of millions, lets not forget it has also created a whole industry which a few at the top are getting very rich from, perhaps these people don’t want a cure?

I for one do.

But how is this possible though when scientists with dissident views to the consensus, including Nobel Prize holders, are systemically gagged. How are new breakthroughs possible when all major medical journals, refuse to publish work that challenges the hypothesis that HIV is the probable cause of AIDS. How can dialogue continue when scientists that do not accept the official story have their funding cut and they cannot operate a laboratory, and as a consequence their credibility is jeopardised?

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
  • Mary Whitehouse
    As a gay man who is living and diagnosed this year with HIV, I find this video absoloutely disturbing that people can believe this codswollop.

    Admittedly after 20 years they have not found a cure for HIV, and AZT was toxic, but the main reason for this was that it was one of the very first drugs to come out to fight against HIV.
    Now there are a whole array of medicines authorised by the FDA , NICE etc to fight the HIV with minimal side effects.
    I take Highly Active Retroviral medication which has now eliminated the virus to 'undetectable levels' within my blood and has assisted my body's immune system to strengthen. This doesn't however mean I'm cured as the virus can lie dormant within bodily tissues.

    In the eighties, a group of gay men in Manchester believed that HIV was a con, that the virus doesn't exist etc. They refused treatment and campaigned against scientists.
    Sadly, the majority of them died of AIDS as the HIV virus weakened their immune systems to a point where it could not fight oppertunistic viruses and cancers.
    Whereas their counterparts who took medication have survived. Now go figure on that one.

    People are dying out there, and to deny that this is just a myth is a very very dangerous route and I am rather surprised at you Dan at promoting this notion.
    Every minute, 5 people world wide contract HIV, equally every minute 4 people die of AIDS.

    I have lost a very close and dear friend due to HIV & AIDS and would not wish this pandemic to last any bit longer.
  • andrew honest
    This is a very nicely conveniently spliced mish mash of comments that are taken out of context from longer interviews. If you could show all the interviews it would take up about 6 hours of your time. These comments are from an outline of statements made over a number of years. Americans unfortunately succumb to conspiracy theories. One statement says Aids started in the gay community yet it has been proved to originate in Africa. It states that african women seem to be immune, yet official staements say 70% of African women have been diagnosed!
    Peter Duesberg a famous viral scientist also questioned if viral flu was lethal.

    Its easy to put the emphasis on drug companies, but they have and are still saving millions of lives. Celebrities may not know very much about HIV (in my experience they tend to know more than the average layman) but they have raised millions to help those with and affected.

    This article is another form of scaremongering and I wonder if this is part of your performance art (which I find extremeley negative and another excuse to get government grants.......
  • Shocked
    It is almost inconceivable that a website for gay men has published such a misinformed article in 2008. It shows incredible editorial irresponsibility given the rising rates of HIV amongst young gay men in this country and is remarkable that such poor journalism is being promoted, undoing the hard work of so many charities and HIV/AIDS activists. For men who have sex with men, this is no time for complacency, for misinformation and mistrust. As the epidemic appears to be taking hold ever more increasingly, particularly in London, it's time for consolidation and a coming together of the gay community to fight HIV not propagating such scaremongering and poor writing such as this which isn't worthy of the name 'journalism'.
  • Martin
    My views are probably very similar to Mary Whitehouse - and it's not often I'm likely to say such a thing - though personally I find it refreshing to see an alternative viewpoint on the subject of HIV and AIDS (a la Channel 4’s alternative queen’s speech every Xmas), one that invites debate, rather than just presenting as fait accompli the usual stories of, "we're all DOOMED, doomed I tell you... but you should still give all your money to AIDS charities as despite the vast evidence to the contrary they are actually doing a spiffing job..." which usual appear at this time of year.

    Martin
  • Martin
    PS. And isn't it a bit hypocritical to criticise the author of the article whilst hiding behind a pseudonym. Shocked? I'm bloody mortified.
blog comments powered by Disqus